

- Are you sure you want to sign out?


- Are you sure you want to delete?
- American Cold War Veterans (482)
- General Veterans Issues (262)
- Cold War Medal (424)
- New member ? (42)
- When and Where Did You Serve (3)
- Download ACWV Application (5)
- Mission Statement (1)
- Asbestos Exposure (1)
- Other Health Issues (17)
- Sign up (1)
- Cold War Casualties (76)
- Legislative Issues (117)
Views: 589
- [none]
- From:
- USA

- Registered: 01/04/2004
- Time spent: 0 hours
- Posts: 370
- Score: 370
- Rank:
- none
The American Legion Strongly Opposed to
President’s Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes for
Treatment
WASHINGTON, DC (March 16, 2009) – The leader of the nation’s largest veterans organization says he is “deeply disappointed and concerned” after a meeting with President Obama today to discuss a proposal to force private insurance companies to pay for the treatment of military veterans who have suffered service-connected disabilities and injuries. The Obama administration recently revealed a plan to require private insurance carriers to reimburse the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in such cases.
“It became apparent during our discussion today that the President intends to move forward with this unreasonable plan,” said Commander David K. Rehbein of The American Legion. “He says he is looking to generate $540-million by this method, but refused to hear arguments about the moral and government-avowed obligations that would be compromised by it.”
The Commander, clearly angered as he emerged from the session said, “This reimbursement plan would be inconsistent with the mandate ‘… to care for him who shall have borne the battle…’ given that the United States government sent members of the armed forces into harm’s way, and not private insurance companies. I say again that The American Legion does not and will not support any plan that seeks to bill a veteran for treatment of a service connected disability at the very agency that was created to treat the unique need of America’s veterans!”
Commander Rehbein was among a group of senior officials from veterans service organizations joining the President, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki and Steven Kosiak, the overseer of defense spending at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The group’s early afternoon conversation at The White House was precipitated by a letter of protest presented to the President earlier this month. The letter, co-signed by Commander Rehbein and the heads of ten colleague organizations, read, in part, “ There is simply no logical explanation for billing a veteran’s personal insurance for care that the VA has a responsibility to provide. While we understand the fiscal difficulties this country faces right now, placing the burden of those fiscal problems on the men and women who have already sacrificed a great deal for this country is unconscionable.”
Commander Rehbein reiterated points made last week in testimony to both House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees. It was stated then that The American Legion believes that the reimbursement plan would be inconsistent with the mandate that VA treat service-connected injuries and disabilities given that the United States government sends members of the armed forces into harm’s way, and not private insurance companies. The proposed requirement for these companies to reimburse the VA would not only be unfair, says the Legion, but would have an adverse impact on service-connected disabled veterans and their families. The Legion argues that, depending on the severity of the medical conditions involved, maximum insurance coverage limits could be reached through treatment of the veteran’s condition alone. That would leave the rest of the family without health care benefits. The Legion also points out that many health insurance companies require deductibles to be paid before any benefits are covered. Additionally, the Legion is concerned that private insurance premiums would be elevated to cover service-connected disabled veterans and their families, especially if the veterans are self-employed or employed in small businesses unable to negotiate more favorable across-the-board insurance policy pricing. The American Legion also believes that some employers, especially small businesses, would be reluctant to hire veterans with service-connected disabilities due to the negative impact their employment might have on obtaining and financing company health care benefits.
“I got the distinct impression that the only hope of this plan not being enacted,” said Commander Rehbein, “is for an alternative plan to be developed that would generate the desired $540-million in revenue. The American Legion has long advocated for Medicare reimbursement to VA for the treatment of veterans. This, we believe, would more easily meet the President’s financial goal. We will present that idea in an anticipated conference call with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel in the near future.
“I only hope the administration will really listen to us then. This matter has far more serious ramifications than the President is imagining,” concluded the Commander.
There are many things wrong in Washington these days but this goes over the top. It is an outright breech of faith and a kick in the gut to those who made sacrifices to preserve our way of life. Write your elected representatives today. This can not be allowed to stand.
Charter Member, ACWV
US Navy, 1973 to 1978
"Dedicated to the Cause"
- support us
A Huge Online Store for Various Cool Gadgets, Accessories: Laser Pointer, Bluetooth Headset, Cell Phone Jammer, MP3 Players, Spy Cameras, Soccer Jersey, Window Curtains, MP4 Player, E Cigarette, Wedding Dresses, Hearing Aids, eBook Reader, Tattoo Machines, LED Light Bulbs, Bluetooth Stereo Headset, Holiday Gifts, Security Camera and Games Accessories and Hobby Gadgets..
And MexiCain wonders why he's not POTUS.
Someone need to Primary both of them right out of office.
|
#7
|
- From:
- USA

- Registered: 11/21/2006
- Time spent: 36055 hours
- Posts: 597
- Score: 597
- Rank:
- none
Now what are we going to do about what they are doing,maybe approach the major VSO's about a national forum of Veterans VSO's nation wide to meet {1 leader from each} this would show unity might get press and the public on our side ?
Sorry Jim that letter needs more kick like 26+ million veterans ,our supporters as well the public then maybe they will listen ?
Undique Venimus
|
#10
|
- From:
- USA

- Registered: 05/19/2008
- Time spent: 37900 hours
- Posts: 540
- Score: 540
- Rank:
- none
"PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH !!"
As an Obama supporter this proposal makes no sense, Don't know what else to say. Although the Legion feels its ok for medicare to pay the VA for a veterans care?? Perhaps someone can tell me the rational there.
Jon
|
#14
|
- From:
- USA

- Registered: 11/21/2006
- Time spent: 36055 hours
- Posts: 597
- Score: 597
- Rank:
- none
Outrage: O
Bneclinkz,
I see what you mean, but I can't say I totally agree with you! VA Healthcare is in a sense socialized healthcare. there is no question, but one of the responsibilities of this or any government is to provide medical treatment for wounded service members.
Now with that said. it's funny that everyone in here is up in arms about something that is of "Consideration". There are pros and cons to everything. If we can alleviate the crushing cost of VA Healthcare by having private insurance supplement the costs at minimal cost to the veteran, so why not? If the costs are to great for the veterans then the proposal gets shot down. This isn't in the budget, and it's not law!
bama Plans to Charge Wounded Veterans for TreatmentI'm a Democrat and I actually agree with you boneclinkz. I don't support war, especially in the 21st century. Every war the US has fought since World War II has been totally unecessary especially the Iraq war. I don't feel much pity for anyone who volunteers to fight in Iraq and then gets seriously wounded or killed. Stupid people do stupid things.
They knew the risks before signing up, and they certainly knew that this BS war had nothing to do with national security. Most of the people who signed up for Iraq were either dumbass kids who were tired of playing video games and wanted to try the real thing, or were suckered into it by the enlistment and ship out bonuses that desperate Army recruiters offered. In any case taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for
Just like I thought and typical of a conservative with no real intelligence, military of otherwise! Just because you served in the military doesn't mean you have a sense of enlightenment unattainable by those who chose not to serve. Nor does it mean that your ass should be kissed because you can march! I see you still failed to mention when america's freedoms where in jeopardy besides WWII! Call me ignorant all you want, but you are not proving your point by doing so, you are however; proving mine!
stupid people.
Okay folks this is not about Dem & GOP its about veterans so L&L get ovet to newsvine and hold the line with me !
Glen
|
#17
|
- From:
- USA

- Registered: 11/21/2006
- Time spent: 36055 hours
- Posts: 597
- Score: 597
- Rank:
- none
Jim thanks for going and I can sure understand how you feel its difficult for me going in there its like holding your breath one can only do it for so long and then your just gasping !
What rocks did some of these (people ?) come from and what planet !
Glen
Undique Venimus
|
#18
|
- From:
- USA

- Registered: 05/19/2008
- Time spent: 37900 hours
- Posts: 540
- Score: 540
- Rank:
- none
"PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH !!"

























